Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Rhetorical Pedagogy

I read this article last Thursday and I can honestly say I don't remember one thing WIlliam Covino said.  I take that back, I remember reading it and not understanding what he was saying.  It was so hard to follow.  As I look back now at the article, the "Rules for Successful Paragraphs," which aren't even his make more sense than anything he said.  Maybe he talked about how these rules are so strict and they don't allow the reader to be free when they write but once again they are clear and to the point and his writing has to be deciphered in order to gleam a bit of information from it.  Instead of writing a chapter, I think he would of served the audience better by following the rules he lays out first, then one paragraph would of been nice.

1 comment:

  1. hi brady,

    i found this on nate's blog addressed to you. he can't post it on here for some reason, so am just cutting and pasting it for you. keep reading! Dr. B ;)

    Below my comment on Brady's blog:

    Hey Brady. I can understand why you had such a rough time reading this article. Covino discussed tons of information in order to chronicalize how the changing views of rhetoric have changed the teaching statagies of composition. I would recommend skipping the information for instructors and mainly focus on the actual content. Personaly, I focused on the Roman methods of teaching and Plato's Socrates, but you should reconsider the reading because the content therein is useful for class and everyday life.
    --posted by NathanShapiro's @ 12:07 PM

    ReplyDelete